Caryl
Churchill's play makes you work hard - but in the immensely brilliant way that
means you are satisfyingly conscious of your brain clanking and whirring into
action, and where the rewards you reap more than fulfil your hopes.
An outsider
enters the fenced in garden that houses three other OAP women. Their
conversation is wonderfully, recognisably mundane. Their truncated sentences
hint at how intuitively they all know what the other thinks, and this mutual
understanding hints at the repetitiveness of their lives and conversations.
Yet, simmering below the domesticity of their concerns, and explored in
monologues that interrupt their dialogue, we learn that their feelings bely the
normality they exude. There is this wonderful disjunct between the normality we
see and the ridiculous strength of their feelings, and the causes for them,
which forcibly prevents us from underestimating them or reducing them to type.
One woman feels 'terrible rage', one an irrational and all consuming fear of
cats, another the excruciating despondency of depression, the last the regret
that a single decision has tainted every subsequent thing, situation and
relationship. And then explorations of the macro are framed against this
micro examination of human life. In this microcosm of a back garden, we see the
catastrophic bubbling below the surface of every individual's life, held in
check by the veneer of civilisation and etiquette. Interspersed with these scenes,
and set apart by two fizzing framed wired large squares of red light set
against a backdrop of pitch black, macro scenarios are set forth to us by the
outsider (who has had to step outside the garden). In these moments, she
variously explores abstract, ridiculous, catastrophic consequences that could
happen if there was a freakishly unexpected shift in things from the external
factors that make our world go round. These external factors span from earth
burying the human race, floods, fires, poison spread by money, food shortages
and wind. Human activity, both grand and small, affects the series of events
that unfold. The visual framing of these episodes means we are constantly
trying to work out its connection to the domestic situation. It is the kind of
thing that rewards thought and study. This is indicative of how seamlessly
James Macdonald's direction, Miriam Buether's set and Peter Mumford's lighting design complement and
enhance Churchill's script. The lighting is particularly notable - subtle
shifts focusing our attention on a monologuing lady; reflecting the depressive
nature of one of the lady's monologues by letting the colour slowly seep out of
the garden; and letting the shift to a late afternoon light work as a metaphor
for the fact these ladies are all entering their twilight years. The use of a
blocking garden fence at the start and end makes it very clear that Linda Bassett is an
intruder, something that is supported by the slight disjunct between her
contributions to the conversation - she is slightly out of sync. There is a
surprising amount of humour to be derived from the piece in this startlingly
good production - thanks both to the gentle familiarly of the characters and
situations contrasted with the abstract and unexpected, as well as due to an
exceptional grasp of comic timing from all the women.
No comments:
Post a Comment